You are here

Canada now set to Criminalize Supplements (already happened in Europe)!

Big Pharma Pushing to Criminalize Supplements

(http://www.naturalnews.com/023121.html),

NaturalNews) A new law being pushed in Canada by Big Pharma seeks to outlaw up to 60 percent of natural health products currently sold in Canada, even while criminalizing parents who give herbs or supplements to their children. The law, known as C-51, was introduced by the Canadian Minister of Health on April 8th, 2008, and it proposes sweeping changes to Canada’s Food and Drugs Act that could have devastating consequences on the health products industry.

Among the changes proposed by the bill are radical alterations to key terminology, including replacing the word “drug” with “therapeutic product” throughout the Act, thereby giving the Canadian government broad-reaching powers to regulate the sale of all herbs, vitamins, supplements and other items. With this single language change, anything that is “therapeutic” automatically falls under the Food and Drug Act. This would include bottled water, blueberries, dandelion greens and essentially all plant-derived substances.

The Act also changes the definition of the word “sell” to include anyone who gives such therapeutic products to someone else. So a mother giving an herb to her child, under the proposed new language, could be arrested for engaging in the sale of unregulated, unapproved “therapeutic substances.” Learn about more of these freedom-squashing changes to the law at the Stop51.com website: http://www.stopc51.com/

New enforcement powers allow Canadian government to seize your home or business At the same time that C-51 is outlawing herbs, supplements and vitamins, it would grant alarming new “enforcement” powers to the thugs enforcement agents who claim to be “protecting” the public from dangerous unapproved “therapeutic agents” like, say, dandelion greens. As explained on the www.Educate-Yourself.org website (http://www.naturalnews.com/023121.html), the C-51 law would allow the Canadian government’s thugs enforcement agents to:

- Raid your home or business without a warrant
- Seize your bank accounts
- Levy fines up to $5 million and a jail terms up to 2 years for merely selling an herb
- Confiscate your property, then charge you storage fees for the expense involved in storing all the products they stole from you

C-51 would even criminalize the simple drying of herbs in your kitchen to be used in an herbal product, by the way. That would now be categorized as a “controlled activity,” and anyone caught engaging in such “controlled activities” would be arrested, fined and potentially jailed. Other “controlled activities” include labeling bottles, harvesting plants on a farm, collecting herbs from your back yard, or even testing herbal products on yourself! (Yes, virtually every activity involving herbs or supplements would be criminalized…)

There’s more, too. C-51 is the Canadian government’s “final solution” for the health products industry. It’s a desperate effort to destroy this industry that’s threatening the profits and viability of conventional medicine. Natural medicine works so well—and is becoming so widely used—that both the Canadian and American governments have decided to “nuke” the industries by passing new laws that effectively criminalize anyone selling such products. They simply cannot tolerate allowing consumers to have continued access to natural products. To do so will ultimately spell the destruction of Big Pharma and the outdated, corrupt and criminally-operated pharmaceutical industry that these criminally-operated governments are trying to protect.

copied from: http://adultindigo.meetup.com/115/messages/boards/thread/4617426

So I've been reading the bill a little bit, and I am really really confused.  I can't reconcile a lot of what this article says with the actual text of the bill.  I'm confused about a bunch of things.  I'm going to have to look at it more closely.

The article says that anything "therapeutic" falls under the act, including blueberries, etc.  But the bill defines things that are therapeutic as:

(a) a drug,
(b) a device,
(c) cells, tissues or organs that are distributed or represented for use in
(i) the diagnosis, treatment, mitigation or prevention of a disease, disorder or abnormal physical state, or its symptoms, in human beings or animals, or
(ii) restoring, correcting or modifying the body structure of human beings or animals or the functioning of parts of the bodies of human beings or animals, or
(d) a combination of two or more of the things referred to in paragraphs (a) to (c);

I'm not seeing "blueberries" in this definition.  ???

The crux of these changes is that "natural health products" will be treated as drugs rather than as food, correct?  In terms of regulation?  I don't know that much about natural health products, but if something is marketed, essentially, as a drug, should it not be regulated as one?  I am sure there is more to it than this, right?  Or am I missing something?  Is the problem that natural health products are finding it difficult to obtain licenses for their products? 

The search and seizure / inspection rights are very disturbing.  THOSE worry me.

Also, as a vegan, I had to laugh about this.  You can't sell anything that:

(a) has a poisonous or harmful substance in or on it;
(b) is unfit for human consumption;
(c) is injurious to human health;
(d) is adulterated; or
(e) was manufactured, processed, prepared, preserved, packaged, stored or conveyed under unsanitary conditions.

Hmmm, MEAT comes to mind...injurious to health, prepared under unsanitary conditions.... :P

Anyway, this is all very much to take in.  I am still trying to cut through the hype and figure everything out.  Thanks for posting, FF!

0 likes

Wow...this is scary. I just started getting into taking suppliments and natural products etc. and I find it disturbing that they could potentially be banned! Banning herbs would be like saying--fruit is illegal! It really doesent make sense--when's the last time you heard of someone dying from a rosemary overdose? Lame! Big Pharm is a giant ass hat. Makes me wonder what is going on in Canada and whether it will bleed over to the U.S. Hmmmmmm keep us updated FF!

0 likes

Here is a link for if you want to DO SOMETHING Let's stop Bill C51 in its tracks! Tell everyone you know about it so that our awareness will prevent healthy products from being banned.

So I've been reading the bill a little bit, and I am really really confused.  I can't reconcile a lot of what this article says with the actual text of the bill.  I'm confused about a bunch of things.  I'm going to have to look at it more closely.

The article says that anything "therapeutic" falls under the act, including blueberries, etc.  But the bill defines things that are therapeutic as:

(a) a drug,
(b) a device,
(c) cells, tissues or organs that are distributed or represented for use in
(i) the diagnosis, treatment, mitigation or prevention of a disease, disorder or abnormal physical state, or its symptoms, in human beings or animals, or
(ii) restoring, correcting or modifying the body structure of human beings or animals or the functioning of parts of the bodies of human beings or animals, or
(d) a combination of two or more of the things referred to in paragraphs (a) to (c);

I'm not seeing "blueberries" in this definition.  ???

The crux of these changes is that "natural health products" will be treated as drugs rather than as food, correct?  In terms of regulation?  I don't know that much about natural health products, but if something is marketed, essentially, as a drug, should it not be regulated as one?  I am sure there is more to it than this, right?  Or am I missing something?  Is the problem that natural health products are finding it difficult to obtain licenses for their products? 

The search and seizure / inspection rights are very disturbing.  THOSE worry me.

Also, as a vegan, I had to laugh about this.  You can't sell anything that:

(a) has a poisonous or harmful substance in or on it;
(b) is unfit for human consumption;
(c) is injurious to human health;
(d) is adulterated; or
(e) was manufactured, processed, prepared, preserved, packaged, stored or conveyed under unsanitary conditions.

Hmmm, MEAT comes to mind...injurious to health, prepared under unsanitary conditions.... :P

Anyway, this is all very much to take in.  I am still trying to cut through the hype and figure everything out.  Thanks for posting, FF!

From what I understand, blueberries are touted as  very high in antioxidants, among other things, they are one of the 'superfoods' that are often suggested for helping prevent cancer. Therefore, they would fall under (ii), would they not? I dunno, it isa all pretty ridiculous to me. Looks like the big corporations are at it again. (like they stopped...)

The main point here... Tell people. Educate yourself and people around you! Ignorance is not cool.

0 likes

I think this is all alarmist, conspiracy theorist hooey.  There are lots of things that are technically possible under a lot of laws but they don't happen.  The laws are there for use against people doing 'real' bad things. Eating fruit hardly falls into that category. If you think the government is going to waste their money raiding people's houses for blueberries then you are not thinking clearly.

Take what Capture said for example,

Wow...this is scary. I just started getting into taking suppliments and natural products etc. and I find it disturbing that they could potentially be banned! Banning herbs would be like saying--fruit is illegal! It really doesent make sense--when's the last time you heard of someone dying from a rosemary overdose? Lame! Big Pharm is a giant ass hat. Makes me wonder what is going on in Canada and whether it will bleed over to the U.S. Hmmmmmm keep us updated FF!

What would you be saying if your supplement or natural product poisoned you?  Would you want the gov't agents to have some power to investigate and shutdown the people/companies making poisonous supplements?  I agree rosemary isn't a problem but what about rosemary grown and package under unsanitary methods? Or maybe spinach tainted with e.coli?

If you read the spirit of the bill you see that it wants to regulate things that if made or used improperly would harm you. I don't see that as a bad thing.

0 likes

Um, excuse me...I've lived in Europe for the past 25 yrs. Not only are herbal supplements and remedies NOT "criminalised" here, they are even sold in pharmacies and parapharmacies (specialising in alternative medicines.) I live in Spain, but I know for a fact that in Germany many alternative herbal treatments are standard in their health care system, as well as other alternative medical procedures.
In fact, just the other day, I was given a long-term prescription for a ginko biloba tincture supplement...paid for by our national health system. Cost to me, 40 cents.

Please be sure of your  facts and sources before saying "this or that has happened in Europe." I know it is often cited in American news stories, but in this case it's not true. I've even heard the ABC Evening News cite "a study in Sweden" (no names of course) which was totally fictitious.

0 likes

I'm still skeptical.  I do believe people should be allowed to treat themselves using whatever natural products they like, but I also think it is reasonable for such products to be regulated.  It is not unheard of that people purchase natural remedies which turn out to be complete garbage. 

I'm sorry, but I am skeptical of an article that talks about being arrested for picking dandelions.  Like armoise suggested, what are they going to do, build a special anti-blueberry police force to raid everyone's homes?  And if the definition of "therapeutic" were as broad as proponents of the bill suggest, can you imagine the number of products which would have to be pulled from grocery store shelves?  It is inconceivable.  They suggest a sweeping ban of products, but they don't consider the simple logistics of enforcing such a ban.  In fact, I dare the government to try to prosecute every individual who picks a dandelion.

I looked at the stop51 website and it told me very little.  It has the text of the bill.  It has one legal paper nitpicking about the language of the bill and discussing the implications of calling certain things "therapeutical" or not, but none of its claims are substantial or worrisome to me.  I would also like to note that this paper is a draft of a paper written on April 9 and surely has not been subject to any sort of critical peer review. 

The critics of this bill say that under it, 60% of natural health products would become illegal.  From what I understand, they make this claim because 60% of natural health products which apply for a license (or whatever the approval is from the FDA) fail to meet the criteria.  We do not know why this is--it could be because they are poor products, or it could be because of corruption in the testing process.  So, if there is a problem, it lies there, not with the bill.  It is misleading to portray this statistic the way the skeptics of this bill do. 

I am also confused when critics talk about "ALL SUPPLEMENTS WILL BE BANNED."  No, all supplements will not be banned.  What part of the bill stipulates that?  The bill says that they will be regulated by the government.  For well-established supplements, like the ones most of us take, there will be no problem at all.

Personally, if I buy a product to improve my health--be it a drug or an herb or a supplement--I want to feel confident that it does what it claims to do.  And that it is what it claims to be!  Without regulation, consumers have no way of knowing if the natural health products they purchase are authentic.  I think this is very dangerous.  Hoodia comes to mind--you know, that weight loss drug that I think Anna Nicole Smith popularized?  People buy that thinking they will lose weight when in reality it can be quite dangerous for you.  Maybe that's not the best example, but that is the gist of the dangers that I see with selling unregulated products.

I think it is important to approach the issue will healthy skepticism on both sides.  I have been searching around online, and I have yet to find a compelling, well-founded piece of evidence that says that this bill will be as detrimental as people fear.  It's all sweeping, generalized, emotional statements.  I remain unconvinced. 

0 likes

Also, this really bothers me.  This is what the author of the paper on the stop51 website wants:

an environment where:

"NHPs (Natural Health Products) are presumed to be safe. A NHP cannot be taken off of the
market unless the Government can prove that it is unsafe."

We certainly cannot do the same for man-made drugs!  Just because a product is a "natural" drug does not mean it can be presumed to be safe by any means!  That is entirely unethical in my mind.

0 likes

is this part of that whole CODEX process?

0 likes

I think this is all alarmist, conspiracy theorist hooey.  There are lots of things that are technically possible under a lot of laws but they don't happen.  The laws are there for use against people doing 'real' bad things. Eating fruit hardly falls into that category. If you think the government is going to waste their money raiding people's houses for blueberries then you are not thinking clearly.

Take what Capture said for example,

Wow...this is scary. I just started getting into taking suppliments and natural products etc. and I find it disturbing that they could potentially be banned! Banning herbs would be like saying--fruit is illegal! It really doesent make sense--when's the last time you heard of someone dying from a rosemary overdose? Lame! Big Pharm is a giant ass hat. Makes me wonder what is going on in Canada and whether it will bleed over to the U.S. Hmmmmmm keep us updated FF!

What would you be saying if your supplement or natural product poisoned you?  Would you want the gov't agents to have some power to investigate and shutdown the people/companies making poisonous supplements?  I agree rosemary isn't a problem but what about rosemary grown and package under unsanitary methods? Or maybe spinach tainted with e.coli?

If you read the spirit of the bill you see that it wants to regulate things that if made or used improperly would harm you. I don't see that as a bad thing.

First--thanks for picking on me...

Second--I never said I didn't want the gov or some agency to investigate contaminated products or to pull ones that are unsafe--what i did say is that Big Pharm is an ass and that i don't want my suppliments banned--how you got that I want poisonous substances running rampent through the country is a big leap--but whatever.

0 likes

??? is all I can say.

Well, not all. I don't like the government we have now in Canada (Stephen Harper - the prime minister - and his Conservative Party are a bunch of noobs, and some of their legislation hurts me a little inside). But to be honest, I'm skeptical about the Conservatives and Big Pharma holding hands and being best friends. Harper might kiss up to Bush, he might be screwing up social services in the country, and he might be catering to the wealthy with unnecessary tax cuts, but I'm not so sure about kissing up to Big Pharma, at least in this way (I could be entirely wrong though - who knows?).

I should look into this more. Canadian politics - don't you love it?

0 likes

Stephen Harper - the prime minister - and his Conservative Party are a bunch of noobs

Best political observation ever.  The word noob should become a regular part of political debate.

Hillary Clinton: Barack Obama is a total n00b!
Barack Obama: Clinton, prepare to be pwned!

0 likes

Changes in law such as this are not motivated by "Big Pharm" politics, but a government interest in protecting citizens. In the US, herbs and other natural items of medicinal value are marketed as "dietary supplements" and are unregulated. This has allowed for the establishment of an almost crimnal group of snake oil salesmen who abuse this legal loophole to completely misrepresent the benefits of natural remedies or to sell aldulterated and non-standardized forms that are not as effective. Regulation is a good thing, as it means nobody would be able to try to sell you pine tree bark for treating multiple scleroses.

I do believe in the benefits of natural remedies, don't get me wrong. It's just that I would like to see a little bit more truth out there in the market, but truth isn't profitable.

EDIT:Just read a part of the article. It is incredibly biased, and as I mentioned earlier, appears to be protecting the "sovereignty" of the health supplement industry. Do you really think companies that make billions of dollars from selling herbal supplies would be more ethical than pharmaceutical companies? If were going to have a witch hunt, lets think about it first so we get the right one. 

0 likes

This has allowed for the establishment of an almost crimnal group of snake oil salesmen who abuse this legal loophole to completely misrepresent the benefits of natural remedies or to sell aldulterated and non-standardized forms that are not as effective. Regulation is a good thing, as it means nobody would be able to try to sell you pine tree bark for treating multiple scleroses.

Exactly.  This is what scares me.

0 likes

Hillary Clinton: Barack Obama is a total n00b!
Barack Obama: Clinton, prepare to be pwned!

Haha, that part gave me a fit! I'm lolzing right now  :-D

0 likes

This has allowed for the establishment of an almost crimnal group of snake oil salesmen who abuse this legal loophole to completely misrepresent the benefits of natural remedies or to sell aldulterated and non-standardized forms that are not as effective. Regulation is a good thing, as it means nobody would be able to try to sell you pine tree bark for treating multiple scleroses.

Exactly.  This is what scares me.

That's what I like about the new Europe-wide trend toward "parapharmacies" or pharmacies that have qualified professional herballists and/or homeopaths on staff. You are getting sound advice from someone who actually knows their territory and knows about the interactions of herbal medicines etc with prescription drugs. And the quality of the supplements and herbs served through parapharmacies is controlled, so that the capsules actually do contain what they say, not sawdust or whatever.

More and more, people here in Europe (particularly France, Spain and Germany, but also Holland and other countries) are turning from standard industrially synthesised drugs and toward homeopathy and other alternative treatment, scared by  the "prescription overkill" of many doctors and scary side effects of some of the new generation of drugs. It's good to have a trained herbal pharmacist to guide the uninformed. Many Spaniards for example will say, "It's an herb, it's harmless, it's natural." Well hey--opium is an herb. Heroin comes from an herb. For that matter, many of the most deadly poisons are vegetable alkaloids. (Foxglove, anyone? Yes, you get digitalin from it, but it's best to know how to use it.) Or nightshade, or...you see my point.

0 likes

Hi all.  Sorry for not replying sooner- I've been away a for a bit.   First off let me say I am happy to see so many people actually reading the bill and discussing it.   ;)b    For those who are skeptical about whether or not it will actually affect the main types of natural, helpful herbs and vitamins that are proven benficial either by actual scientific-backed studies (which is rare because most scientific studies are only done on the drugs pushed by Big Pharma since new drug cocktails are where they make their money, not simple, basic, "common" herbs and natural remedies) or simple, commonly known now by years of empirical use and experience over generations herbs, minerals, vitamins, etc,  I applaud that you are being analytical.  It is always good to look at the facts along with all the angles and the big picture!  Unfortunately the big picture does include the whole Codex Alimentarius scheme of gaining control of our world's food supply (including herbs, vitamins, and any supplements that can affect nutrition and health).  This bill may not spell it out concisely at this "introductory" phase, but what it DOES allow (see below) is the removal of the right for the "people" to have any control over what they choose to allow as safe or permissable in alternative health and nutritional supplements.  You're right, it doesn't state specifically YET that ALL specfic herbs, vitamins, minerals are banned.  It DOES completely leave wide open the door for that to happen easily WITHOUT anyone being able to stop it, though, once the law has been passed so that Canada must be compliant with other foreign policies' nutritional guidelines.  This is where Codex falls in.  They are pushing and enforcing their nutritional/food standards on other, smaller, less powerful countries that cannot afford to lose the U.N.'s and WTO's sanctions, grants, and benefits that are threatened to be stopped if the countries do not comply.   (Codex is a part of the U.N. and W.T.O.)   Now once Canda agrees to hand over her power of  choice and control of nutrional standards to beaurucrats who are more interested in getting people malnourished and sick so they can make thier profits on their stock and involvement in the Big Pharma and Big Chema companies (gmo crops are being FORCED on these smaller, less financially powerful countries to be grown and eaten, which racks up debt for the individual farmers for having to buy seed every year instead of being able to use their own from their previous year's original seed-bearing unaltered crops, along with making their families and the countries' population slowly sick from eating the gmo's-- viscious, evil cycle controlled by Big Chema who creates these gmo's and chemicals needed to promote the  growth of the gmo crops-- Yes, it's all inter-related because it all comes back to who owns the big corps profitting from keeping people sick, keeping control of food, keeping control of our money, keeping us at war with each other, keeping us in fear of the economy so we look blindly to gov't to help us while gov't keeps its knowledge and therefore power and money in tight a circle  - it is ALL tied together if you haven't noticed that yet), Canadians will then start to see the noose tighten and the different and numerous herbs and supplements they think are great being listed as illegal. Codex is not stupid.  It does not list its name on any of these bills.  It does not work that way.  The representatives for the comittees go to Codex's annual meetings (usually held in Rome and in Germany), listen to what their "scientists" (many whom worked for Hitler and the Nazi's) suggest as recommended, then come back to their country's Congress and recommend the UN's (Codex's) suggestions and then it goes straight to being presnted as a bill.   

Even if you do not believe that there are some people who are evil enough to care how it affects the health of needy and innocent people, or whether you believe they would not ban certain things becuase they would still want to make the $9 profit on a bottle of herbs and keep them in circulation (and the pharmaceutical industry is making much much larger profits that make mere $9 profits insignificant), what does your gut tell you about the portions of the bill that would allow seizures, intrusions without warrant, etc, etc for possessing "therapeutic products" which can be easliy interpretted later to mean whatever "they" (not the People though) want?   I am all for regulating natural substances in order to stop harmful "quackery" by the small minority, but this is NOT the law to do that.  There are far too many open-ended assumptions and loose ends written in here that allow for easy misuse by the powerful few over the masses once this was passed.  You want regulation, go for it, but present it in bills that are much more precise and specific and not open to misuse and abuse by those in the postions of power.  Keep the power with you all, with the People!  (I say "you all" because I am not in Canada.  And before someone accuses me of needing to mind my own buisiness, I bring this up out of concern for all people no matter where on earth we are located.  I do not believe in the ignorant and pompass slogan some chant of "God bless America" as if only Americans deserve to be happy, healthy, successful- I belive in "God bless our whole world!"   Everyone deserves decency, health, and happiness.  That is why I speak up.  I speak up here in the U.S. too about what Codex is trying to sneak through in our own Congress, also.)  You're ok with certain portions of the bill, but don't like other parts-  fine!  Contact your reps to let them know you insist they do not pass those portions, or better yet, reject the bill until it reads to how you, the People, desire it and feel comfortable! 

And as far as herbs and vitamins being banned in Europe-  Perhaps I spoke too vaguely.  Spain may not have the ban YET-  I would suggest taking the time to check your gov'ts websites and checking out all of your countries' proposed bills regarding food, supplements, nutrition, ag and gmo, etc related bills to see if there are not some in the works- many countries do.  I do know first hand that some countries in Europe HAVE outlawed vitmain and mineral and herbal supplements.  I think it is Norway and Germany that have, possibly Ireland and Scotland too now.  I have had a girl ask me to mail her vitamins becaue she cannot buy them in her European country, as it is illegal now, but right now she can receive them as  a "gift" from out of country friends or relatives in small doses.  SO just because Spain does still allow them, do not assume all European countries do.  Yes, it is crazy sounding, that such a thing could actually happen... but it is still sadly true.  Not enough people get concerned, research it, and care, and so these laws pass because the greedy few get their selfish, evil way while we "regular, well-meaning, but too lazy to research and investigate for ourselves- joes" only care about the latest celebrity's doings, our jobs, or having enough money at the end of the week to get a couple of beers and watch our football-- ie: distractions.  That is how these laws get passed.           
       

More info:
Canadian Rights and Freedoms are at Risk, An Important Notice Regarding Bill C-51

On April 8th, 2008, the Canadian Minister of Health introduced Bill C-51 into the House of Commons. This Bill proposes significant changes to the current Food and Drugs Act that will have wide-ranging negative implications for Canadians.

Bill C-51 will:

· Remove democratic oversight, bypassing elected officials to vote in laws and allow bureaucrats to adopt laws from other countries without our consent.

· Remove 70% of Natural Health Products from Canadians and many others will be available by prescription only.

· Restrict research and development of safe natural alternatives in favor of high risk drugs.

· Punish Canadians with little or no opportunity for protection or recourse for simply speaking about or giving a natural product without the approval of government. More than 70% of people in Canada use a Natural Health Product. The new law goes so far as to warrant action against a person who would give another person an unapproved amount of garlic on the recommendation that it would improve that persons health.

Proposed New Enforcement Powers:

· Inspectors will enter private property without a warrant

· Inspectors will take your property at their discretion

· Inspectors will dispose of your property at will

· Inspectors will not reimburse you for your losses

· Inspectors will seize your bank accounts

· Inspectors will charge owners shipping and storage charges for seized property

· Inspectors will be empowered to store your property indefinitely

· Inspectors will levy fines of up to $5,000,000.00 and/or seek 2 years in jail per incident

With your assets and money under their control will you be able to defend yourself in Court?

Can you trust government with this new law and enforcement power?

Would our government really ever turn this law against us? Read the following account.

In 2003 Health Canada launched an attack on a group of mentally ill patients and the company who supported them naturally. They seized shipments of a safe natural therapy required by the patients and stormed the support center with 17 armed officers and agents. The company (Truehope) reported that they lost contact with more than 300 of their Canadian participants. The Canadian Mental Health Association told of suicides as a result of government action.

Health Canada then charged the not for profit company, burdening them with heavy legal costs. Truehope was found innocent by necessity and instructed by the judge to continue under legal and moral responsibility. Although the agents admitted knowing they were injuring people through their actions, they stated under oath they care only about policy and directive. And what happened to the more than 300 mentally ill Canadians that became unreachable? In the months and years following, reports of hospitalizations and suicides during the seizures have surfaced. No Health Canada agent has ever been charged.

Will this new law be used to abuse and punish special interest groups, minorities, religious groups or others?

Why do bureaucrats want to bypass the Parliament and approval to create new laws?

Why do bureaucrats want seizure warrants without judge approval?

With fines being increased a 1000 times, and seizing authority without a warrant, is Bill C-51 meant to bankrupt and silence its target audience?

Canada's Bill C-51:
An Act to amend the Food and Drugs Act and to make consequential amendments to other Acts

Proposed legislation currently before Parliament could potentially have a major impact on natural health in Canada and restrict the choices Canadian people have when it comes to health products.

More info from Draft Discussion Paper - Legal Review by Shawn Buckley, president of the NHPPA:

What the Act does: the Act gives broad power and responsibility to Health Canada inspectors to force “regulated persons” to take whatever measures the inspectors deem necessary to ensure safety. I am troubled by this due to the following scenario developing:

1) Currently roughly 60% of natural health product license applications are failing. The majority of these license applications are for single ingredient products which are easier to license then multi-ingredient products. The percentage of failed license applications is expected to increase as more multi-ingredient product license applications are considered. My estimate is an overall failure rate of 70%. This means that over 60% of the natural health products on the market will fail the licensing process and will become illegal. At that point the manufacturer can willfully withdraw them from the market or Health Canada can take enforcement action;

2) the NHPD has been given more resources to process license applications which mean that the majority of the products will become illegal sooner rather than later;

3) Health Canada is currently going to universities to recruit university graduates as inspectors because Health Canada anticipates an increased need for enforcement, and

4) Bill C-51 gives inspectors new powers to force products off of the market.

Read Bill C-51 or download the print-version PDF .

• Contact your Member of Parliament.

• Read Mike Adams' C51 analysis at Natural News.

• Trojan Horse Legislation Sponsored by Big Pharma: "Canadians need to wake up and see what type of Bills that the Harper Conservative government is trying to introduce and bring into law in Canada."

• Canada's C-51: Trojan Horse Legislation Sponsored by Big Pharma -- Bill C-51 Unlawfully Suppresses Canadian Citizens' Rights and Freedoms -- Educate Yourself

Bill C-51 will:

• Remove democratic oversight, bypassing elected officials to vote in laws and allow bureaucrats to adopt laws from other countries without our consent.

• Remove 70% of Natural Health Products from Canadians and many others will be available by prescription only.

• Restrict research and development of safe natural alternatives in favor of high risk drugs.

• Punish Canadians with little or no opportunity for protection or recourse for simply speaking about or giving a natural product without the approval of government. More than 70% of people in Canada use a Natural Health Product. The new law goes so far as to warrant action against a person who would give another person an unapproved amount of garlic on the recommendation that it would improve that person’s health.

• It's your right to choose your health products and therapies -- Stop government from enforcing U.S. law and other jurisdictions upon Canadians without consent -- Stop C-51.

0 likes

Well put, Firefightress.

If the bill truly is meant for honest, well meaning purposes, I'd support it. However, it is to vague, to open to loop holes. The current government is not trustworthy. The system as it is is full of greed and corruption. That said, I do not support Bill C-51.

0 likes

I'm all for regulating dietary supplements personally. The purity and bioavailability of herbal supplements currently aren't assessed, and even though every bottled of everything herbal says that it's not to "treat, diagnose, or cure any condition," there are still claims out there, especially with the now off the market ephedra/ma huang. And it seems pretty crazy to me that melatonin, a hormone, can be bought without prescription, and is stocked in the section with stuff that's actually herbal, like ginseng or gingko biloba.

I think we'd benefit if they actually tested the efficacy of these products. The problem is, though, that if the same regulations that apply to new pharmaceuticals in the US are applied to herbal supplements, the prices wil go up (lots of testing involved), and animal testing would be required (as it is of new drugs). I can see why pharmaceutical companies would want the herbal supplements to be regulated: dietary supplements would no longer be faaar cheaper than prescriptions, and I bet they're hoping to discredit some of the health claims. But it could also backfire: we could find that some herbal remedies are better and safer than synthetic drugs. I remember reading (for my drugs/behavior psych class) that there's some sort of study where St. John's Wort was just as effective in relieving depression as current anti-depressant medications  :o

0 likes
Log in or register to post comments